The Fission Frontier in the 21st Century

Sydwell Rammala
Feb 3
14 min read

The global energy transition has entered a decisive phase as of February 2, 2026, where the abstract goals of decarbonization have been superseded by the concrete requirements of sovereign energy security and industrial competitiveness. For Acacia Investment Research, the nuclear sector represents the most complex intersection of geopolitical strategy and long-cycle capital investment.

This report examines the divergence between Western and Chinese financing paradigms, the emergence of nuclear process heat as a linchpin of industrial energy strategy, and the rigorous path-to-profitability metrics for listed nuclear entities compared against the historical benchmarks of the tech and crypto sectors.

Nuclear disasters — a short primer

The history of nuclear energy is punctuated by high-consequence events that fundamentally reshape the cost of capital and the regulatory landscape. For investors, these incidents represent the "left-tail" risk that mandates sovereign-backed insurance frameworks and significant contingency buffers in project finance. Historically, major accidents have led to immediate capital flight, the re-pricing of nuclear risk, and decade-long moratoria on new builds.¹

The International Nuclear Event Scale (INES) serves as the industry standard for communicating the safety significance of these events. Level 7 events (Major Accidents) like Chernobyl and Fukushima involve widespread health and environmental effects, while lower-level events often catalyze specific regulatory or technological shifts.²

Timeline of Major Nuclear and Radiological Events

Year	Event name	Location	INES level	Immediate human toll (deaths/injuries)
1957	Mayak (Kyshtym) Accident	Soviet Union	6	200+ deaths (estimate) ⁴
1979	Three Mile Island	United States	5	0 deaths; 0 injuries ³
1986	Chernobyl Disaster	Northern Ukraine	7	30 deaths; 134 radiation injuries ²
2011	Fukushima Daiichi	Japan	7	0 direct; 573 indirect deaths ²
2019	Nyonoksa Accident	Russia	4 (est.)	5-7 deaths; 6+ injuries ⁶

Practical Impacts on Policy and Finance

Chernobyl (1986): Forced a global redesign of RBMK reactors and established the "secrecy vs. transparency" protocol that still influences IAEA peer reviews.²
Fukushima (2011): Triggered a $200 billion remediation effort and led to national energy shifts, such as Germany's nuclear phase-out (Atomausstieg).²
Three Mile Island (1979): Effectively halted US nuclear expansion for 30 years, shifting focus to "Human Factors" engineering and increasing the length of NRC licensing cycles.¹
Mayak (1957): Kept secret for decades, its eventual disclosure led to stricter global protocols for high-level liquid waste storage.⁴
Goiânia (1987): Led to the creation of the IAEA's assistance convention for radiological emergencies and tighter tracking of medical isotopes.
Nyonoksa (2019): Heightened scrutiny on "micro-reactor" safety and confirmed the presence of short-lived fission products in non-utility nuclear tests.⁷

Lessons for project finance

Sovereign Guarantees: Critical for backstopping unlimited third-party liability that private insurance markets cannot absorb.
Contingency Buffers: Modern projects (e.g., Sizewell C) now include contingency funds representing ~12.5% of direct costs to manage regulatory "creep" after safety reviews.¹⁰
State Insurance Pools: National caps on liability (e.g., €1.2 billion in the UK) are essential to maintain the bankability of private debt tranches.
Conservative Stress Tests: Financing now mandates "station blackout" and "loss of cooling" simulations to prove passive safety resilience.³

Section 1: Funding models (types, mechanics, and mechanics)

The primary obstacle to the nuclear renaissance remains the "capital chokepoint"—the inherent difficulty of financing multi-decade assets in short-termist equity markets. The period leading into 2026 has seen a fundamental reorganization of how Western nations approach this problem, moving closer to the state-led models that have enabled China’s rapid fleet expansion.

The UK’s Regulated Asset Base (RAB) Model: A Landmark in Project Finance

The financial close of the Sizewell C project on November 4, 2025, serves as the definitive proof of concept for the Regulated Asset Base (RAB) model in the nuclear context.¹¹ This model represents a departure from the "Contracts for Difference" (CfD) framework used for Hinkley Point C, which placed the entirety of construction risk on the private developer. Under the RAB model, consumers contribute a small, regulated amount to the project costs during the construction phase, effectively providing a low-cost, continuous revenue stream that serves to attract private debt and equity by lowering the risk profile.¹¹

The financial structure of Sizewell C is a composite of public and private interests, reflecting a new "Western Hybrid" model of nuclear ownership. The UK Government has emerged as the single largest equity shareholder, signaling that nuclear power is once again viewed as a primary national infrastructure asset rather than a purely commercial utility venture.¹¹

Shareholder Entity	Equity Stake (%)	Investment/Role
UK Government	44.9	Lead Policy Stakeholder; £14.2bn initial commitment ¹²
La Caisse	20.0	Institutional Pension Capital ¹¹
Centrica	15.0	Strategic Utility Partner ¹¹
EDF	12.5	Technical Lead; max £1.1bn construction investment ¹¹
Amber Infrastructure	7.6	Private Infrastructure Specialist ¹¹

The project’s debt raise, totaling £5 billion, was supported by a syndicate of thirteen international banks, including BNP Paribas, HSBC, and Citibank.¹¹ This participation by global tier-one banks indicates that the RAB model has successfully addressed the "bankability" concerns that plagued previous Western nuclear proposals. The UK government estimates that this financing structure will save consumers approximately £30 billion over the plant's lifetime by significantly reducing the interest-on-debt components of the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE).¹¹

The US "Energy Dominance" and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)

In the United States, the legislative environment was reshaped on July 4, 2025, with the signing of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). This legislation extended the incentives of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) while tightening the geopolitical strings attached to them.¹⁴ The OBBBA maintains the Section 45U Production Tax Credit (PTC) for existing nuclear plants and the technology-neutral 45Y and 48E credits for new zero-emission generation.¹⁴

Crucially, the OBBBA introduced a more aggressive "Foreign Entity of Concern" (FEOC) regime. Starting in 2026, projects utilizing nuclear fuel or critical components from Russia or China are largely disqualified from receiving the full suite of federal tax credits. This policy is designed to force the development of a domestic High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) supply chain, though it introduces near-term supply risks for Small Modular Reactor (SMR) startups that previously relied on international fuel sourcing.

Credit Mechanism	Code Section	Adjusted Value (2026)	Strategic Intent
Nuclear PTC	45U	$15/MWh (Inflation-Adj.)	Lifecycle extension of current LWR fleet ¹⁵
Clean Electricity PTC	45Y	$15/MWh base	Incentive for new SMR and Gen IV deployments ¹⁴
Nuclear Energy Community Adder	OBBBA	+10% to PTC/ITC	Repurposing coal communities for nuclear ¹⁴
Energy Dominance Financing (EDF)	§1706	Up to $250bn	National security-linked loan guarantees

The transformation of the Department of Energy’s (DOE) loan program into the "Energy Dominance Financing" (EDF) program marks a shift toward prioritizing grid reliability and national security over purely environmental outcomes. The EDF program supports non-intermittent baseload power and critical mineral supply chains, providing a massive capital pool for advanced nuclear developers.

The Chinese State-Owned Engine: Scalability and Policy Lending

China continues to operate the world’s most prolific nuclear construction program, driven by a state-owned enterprise (SOE) model that eliminates the market-based "valley of death" faced by Western developers. The China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) and China General Nuclear Power Corporation (CGN) function as vertically integrated national champions, backed by the China Exim Bank and other policy lenders.¹⁶

China’s cost of capital is estimated to be significantly lower than Western counterparts, often cited as being in the 2-3% range for state-backed infrastructure, compared to 5-15% for private Western projects. This low-interest environment, combined with a "fleet approach" that builds multiple identical units, allows China to achieve capital costs as low as $3,000 per kW, compared to $8,000-$11,000 per kW for newcomer Western projects.¹⁶

China’s export strategy, formalized through the "Green Belt and Road Initiative," utilizes Hualong One reactors as geopolitical anchors. For example, the Karachi Units 2 and 3 in Pakistan were financed through $5 billion in loans from China’s Exim Bank, creating a 60-year operational and fuel-dependency relationship.¹⁶ By early 2026, China has 28 reactors under construction, ensuring a continuous refinement of its supply chain and construction techniques that Western nations are only beginning to re-learn.

Section 3: Why energy matters for industry

The most significant shift in nuclear strategy as of 2026 is the recognition that nuclear power is not merely an electricity generator, but a primary source of high-temperature industrial process heat. This is essential for the decarbonization of heavy industries—steel, cement, aluminum, and chemicals—which together account for over 30% of global primary energy demand.¹⁹

The Thermal Heat Map of Heavy Industry

Conventional Light Water Reactors (LWRs) produce steam which is suitable for electricity generation and low-temperature district heating but insufficient for many high-energy industrial chemical processes.²¹ The emergence of Generation IV designs, such as High-Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (HTGRs), changes the situation.

Industry	Primary Process	Energy Intensity
Steel	Blast Furnace / DRI	11.71 - 23.67 GJ/t ¹⁹
Chemicals	Distillation / Cracking	High ²³
Cement	Calcination	2.16 GJ/t (clinker) ¹⁹
Aluminum	Smelting / Electrolysis	Very High ²³
Refining	Chemical Conversion	High ²³

Advanced reactors are being positioned as "behind-the-meter" assets for industrial clusters. The Xuwei Phase I project in China’s Jiangsu province is a pioneer in this regard, coupling an HTGR with two PWRs to provide both high-quality industrial steam (32.5 million tonnes annually) and 11.5 billion kWh of electricity to a massive petrochemical base.²⁴ This hybrid "heat-to-electricity" mode maximizes the load factor and economics of the plant by switching output based on the industrial cycle.²⁴

SMRs and the Decarbonization of "Hard-to-Abate" Sectors

For Western industries, the modularity of SMRs allows for deployment at existing industrial sites that lack the space or cooling water requirements of large-scale 1.6 GW reactors. SMRs like the Xe-100 can be scaled in increments of 80 MWe to match the specific thermal loads of a refinery or a mining operation.²¹ This is particularly relevant for the US and UK, where industrial clusters are increasingly seeking dedicated, zero-carbon power to avoid the volatility of grid prices and the potential carbon taxes of the future.

In the United States, the 2026 landscape shows an increasing number of technology and industrial offtakers signing long-term Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with nuclear providers. Microsoft’s deal with Constellation Energy to restart Three Mile Island and Meta’s partnership with TerraPower for 2.8 GW of capacity demonstrate that the world’s largest companies are now directly financing the nuclear supply chain to secure their energy future.

Section 4: Implications for investors

Listed nuclear companies: loss-making today, profitable tomorrow?

A rigorous analysis of listed nuclear companies requires moving beyond the current "zero-revenue" hype to understand the structural path to net profitability. The nuclear sector is currently experiencing a "speculative decoupling" where startups with no operating assets command market caps that dwarf established, profitable utilities.¹

The Capital Cycle: Nuclear vs. Amazon and Tencent

The historical timelines of Amazon and Tencent provide a useful benchmark for the current crop of nuclear startups. Amazon’s IPO in 1997 came just three years after its founding, during a period of hyper-growth where revenue was doubling or tripling annually despite expanding net losses.²⁵

Company	Phase	Revenue Growth (YoY)	Net Loss (IPO/Early)	Years to Net Profit
Amazon	1996-1997	2,982% ²⁵	$5.78M ²⁵	7 Years (2004) ²⁶
Netflix	Early 2000s	98% (2002)	$38.6M (2001)	1 Year (2003)
NuScale	2025-2026	Pre-Revenue	$120M - $150M est.	2030+ Targeted ²⁷
Rolls-Royce SMR	2025-2026	De-risking Phase	R&D Intensive	2030 Targeted ²⁸

The critical difference is that Amazon’s losses were relatively small compared to its revenue scale even in 1996 ($15.7M revenue vs $5.7M loss).²⁵ Amazon destroyed benchmarks using the "Rule of 40" (growth + margin) because its revenue doubled while its losses stayed relatively flat as a percentage of sales.²⁵ Current nuclear startups like Oklo and Fermi Energy are going public at valuations of $17bn-$26bn with $0 in revenue and $0 in operating reactors.¹ This creates a significantly more precarious path to profitability than the early internet giants, as nuclear developers face 10-year lead times for licensing and construction before their first dollar of revenue.¹

Tencent’s success was built on an "ecosystem" model, leveraging a primary platform into a multi-vertical profit engine. Listed nuclear firms like Cameco are attempting a similar "vertically integrated" play by owning the uranium mining, the fuel services, and a significant stake in the reactor designer (Westinghouse).²⁹ Cameco’s 2025 results show this strategy is working, with consolidated adjusted EBITDA reaching $1.3 billion in the first nine months of the year.³⁰

Crypto Cycles and "Sovereign Block Space" Energy Demand

The 2024-2026 crypto cycle has introduced a new class of industrial energy consumer: the high-density data center operator focused on sovereign block space and AI. Coinbase’s 2026 outlook views block space as a "vital commodity for the digital economy," requiring highly resilient, zero-carbon baseload power.³¹

Riot Platforms and Marathon Digital (MARA) have shifted their strategies from simple Bitcoin mining to becoming foundational builders of digital infrastructure. Riot’s Q3 2025 results show record revenue of $180.2 million, but also highlights the increasing cost of energy in the network.³² The average cost to mine a Bitcoin for Riot reached $46,324 in Q3 2025, driven by a 52% rise in the global hash rate.³²

Crypto Entity	Q3 2025 Revenue	Net Income	Hash Rate / Capacity	Energy Strategy
Riot Platforms	$180.2M ³²	$104.5M ³²	38.5 EH/s ³³	112MW data center expansion ³²
MARA	$252M ³⁴	N/A	60.4 EH/s ³⁴	70% capacity owned/operated ³⁴
Coinbase	Q3 '25 High	$433M ³⁵	Platform Focus	DAT 2.0 institutional integration ³¹

The "demand response" credits received by Riot—$6.2 million in Q3 2025 alone—demonstrate the synergy between large-scale digital loads and nuclear-heavy grids.³³ These companies are increasingly acting as the "anchor tenants" for new nuclear deployments, providing the long-term, price-insensitive offtake that makes SMR projects financeable.

Valuation Multiples: Identifying the Sentiment Trap

The nuclear sector in 2026 is currently exhibiting the hallmarks of a speculative bubble, where traditional valuation metrics like EV/EBITDA are being replaced by more novel measures such as EV/Pipeline or EV/Backlog.¹

A significant disconnect has emerged between companies with operating assets and those with "blueprints".¹ Zero-revenue startups collectively command $46.7 billion in market value, while established, revenue-generating energy companies trade at significantly lower multiples.¹

Listed Entity	Market Cap (Jan 2026)	Revenue Status	Forward Multiple
Constellation Energy	~$87 Billion	Profitable / Generating	22x P/E (approx)
Oklo	$26 Billion	Zero Revenue	N/A ¹
Fermi Energy	$17-19 Billion	Zero Revenue	N/A ¹
Nano Nuclear	$1.8 - 2.7 Billion	Zero Revenue	N/A ³⁶
NuScale (SMR)	$5.5 Billion	Pre-Revenue	N/A ²⁷

Bank of America has downgraded several zero-revenue startups, warning that current valuations embed "unrealistic deployment ramps".¹ Statistically, zero-revenue IPOs face a 3.8% higher delisting rate within three years compared to revenue-generating peers.¹ For nuclear, the bottleneck is not just capital, but the physical reality of the supply chain: grid connection waits currently average 6 years, and NRC licensing takes a minimum of 3.5 years.¹

Uranium producers like Uranium Energy Corp (UEC) and Denison Mines are operating on a more traditional industrial path. UEC reported $66.8 million in revenue for the first half of fiscal 2025, with a gross profit of $24.5 million from its physical uranium portfolio.³⁸ Denison Mines, with over $700 million in liquidity, is positioned to fund its $600 million Phoenix project capital requirements entirely from its own balance sheet.¹⁰

Denison's "Capped Call" strategy, utilized in its $345 million convertible note offering in August 2025, demonstrates a sophisticated approach to financing that protects existing shareholders from dilution while securing the capital needed for its mid-2028 production target.⁴⁰ This represents a

"bankable" path to profitability that is absent in the more speculative reactor plays.

Section 5: Practical recommendations

Conclusion & call to action

The nuclear sector on February 2, 2026, is a tale of two capitalisms. On one side, the state-led models of China and the RAB-supported models of the UK are successfully deploying large-scale infrastructure by socializing the initial capital risk. On the other, the US public markets are experiencing a speculative frenzy in SMR startups that, while technologically promising, face a decade of regulatory and supply-chain hurdles before achieving net profitability.¹

For investors seeking sustainable returns, the path to profit lies in three areas:

Vertically Integrated Producers: Companies like Cameco that control the mining, fuel services, and reactor IP, allowing them to capture margin across the entire nuclear cycle.²⁹
Infrastructure Anchors: Utilities with operating fleets and passive safety designs that are securing long-term PPAs with high-margin offtakers like AI data centers.
Industrial Process Heat Pioneers: Early movers in the HTGR and industrial steam markets who are solving the thermal energy needs of heavy industry.²¹

The historical lesson from Amazon is that the "Rule of 40" only works when revenue growth is real and sequential.²⁵ Nuclear developers selling "paper promises" without operating reactors or secure fuel supplies face a high probability of a 90% crash, similar to the dot-com or EV-startup collapses of the past.¹ The 2026 nuclear renaissance is real, but it is an industrial cycle, not a software cycle; it requires the patience of sovereign capital rather than the impatience of retail sentiment.

Annex: Data Annex & Slide Bullets

Recent Reactor Projects (Last 15 Years)

Project name	Country	Financing model	Lead Developer	Key Financier(s)	Year of Start/Close	Indicative CAPEX per GW
Hinkley Point C	UK	CfD	EDF / CGN	Private/ECA	2017 ⁴¹	$13-15bn (est) ¹³
Sizewell C	UK	RAB	EDF / UK Govt	National Wealth Fund/Banks	2025 ¹¹	$12bn (est) ¹²
Vogtle 3-4	USA	Rate-Base/Loan Guarantees	Southern Co / Bechtel	DOE LPO	2013	$15.5bn (est) ⁴²
Barakah	UAE	SOE / Export Credit	ENEC / KEPCO	UAE Govt / K-Exim	2012	$5.5bn (est) ⁴²
Fuqing 5-6	China	SOE Balance Sheet	CNNC	State Banks	2015 ¹⁸	$3-4bn (est) ¹⁶
Akkuyu 1	Turkey	BOO	Rosatom	Russian State	2018	$4.2bn (est)
Xuwei 1	China	SOE Hybrid	CNNC	State Banks	2026 ⁴²	$3-4bn (est) ²⁴

References

UK Government / Sizewell C (Nov 2025). Financial Close for Sizewell C Project.
World Nuclear News (Nov 2025). UK's Sizewell C achieves financing landmark.
Morgan Lewis (July 2025). The Impact of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' on Nuclear Tax Incentives.
Cameco Corporation (Nov 2025). Q3 2025 Quarterly Report.
Denison Mines (Nov 2025). Third Quarter Operational and Financial Results.
US Department of Energy (Jan 2026). Office of Energy Dominance Financing Year-in-Review.
IAEA (2024-2025). Development and Implementation Support Programme for Nuclear Verification.
World Nuclear Association (2025). Plans for New Reactors Worldwide.
Bloomberg/Bank of America Equity Research (Sept 2025). Downgrade of Zero-Revenue SMR Startups.

Works cited

These Startups Soar on Zero Revenue – History Says 90% Crash Is Coming | Investing.com, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.investing.com/analysis/these-startups-soar-on-zero-revenue--history-says-90-crash-is-coming-200668591
What was the death toll from Chernobyl and Fukushima? - Our World in Data, accessed February 2, 2026, https://ourworldindata.org/what-was-the-death-toll-from-chernobyl-and-fukushima
Nuclear reactor - Three Mile Island, Chernobyl - Britannica, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.britannica.com/technology/nuclear-reactor/Three-Mile-Island-and-Chernobyl
Kyshtym disaster - Wikipedia, accessed February 2, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyshtym_disaster
The Radiological Accident in Goiânia - Scientific, technical publications in the nuclear field | IAEA, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub815_web.pdf
Nyonoksa radiation accident - Wikipedia, accessed February 2, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyonoksa_radiation_accident
Russia says nuclear accident during suspected missile engine test released radioactive gas cloud - CBS News, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-nuclear-accident-released-radioactive-gas-cloud-isotopes-government-reveals-today-2019-08-26/
Nuclear disaster at Mayak in 1957 - Storm and Smith, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.stormsmith.nl/Resources/m13mayak20190713F.pdf
Here's what we know so far about Russia's mysterious radioactive blast - Bellona.org, accessed February 2, 2026, https://bellona.org/news/nuclear-issues/2019-08-heres-what-we-know-so-far-about-russias-mysterious-radioactive-blast
Denison Reports Readiness to Commence Construction of Flagship Phoenix ISR Project and Provides Capital Cost Update, accessed February 2, 2026, https://denisonmines.com/news/denison-reports-readiness-to-commence-construction-122840/
UK's Sizewell C achieves financing landmark - World Nuclear News, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/uks-sizewell-c-achieves-financing-landmark
Final Investment Decision reached for Sizewell C – the biggest British clean energy project in a generation, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.sizewellc.com/news-views/final-investment-decision-reached-for-sizewell-c-the-biggest-british-clean-energy-project-in-a-generation/
UK Announces Final Investment Decision For £38 Billion Sizewell C Nuclear Power Station, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.nucnet.org/news/uk-announces-final-investment-decision-for-gbp38-billion-sizewell-c-nuclear-power-station-7-2-2025
The Impact of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' on Nuclear Tax ..., accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2025/07/the-impact-of-the-one-big-beautiful-bill-act-on-nuclear-tax-incentives
Nuclear power projects gain momentum as federal tax incentives, data center demand transform financing landscape | JD Supra, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/nuclear-power-projects-gain-momentum-as-8714980/
US Inaction Is Ceding the Global Nuclear Market to China and Russia | Wilson Center, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/us-inaction-ceding-global-nuclear-market-china-and-russia
World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2025 (HTML version), accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.worldnuclearreport.org/World-Nuclear-Industry-Status-Report-2025-HTML-version
Nuclear Power in China, accessed February 2, 2026, https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/china-nuclear-power
Driving Energy Efficiency in Heavy Industries – Analysis - IEA, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.iea.org/articles/driving-energy-efficiency-in-heavy-industries
Industry - Energy System - IEA, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.iea.org/energy-system/industry
Powering Heavy Industry & Manufacturing with Advanced Nuclear Energy, accessed February 2, 2026, https://x-energy.com/blog-all/powering-heavy-industry-manufacturing-with-advanced-nuclear-energy
Industrial Heating Profile and Electrification - Global Efficiency Intelligence, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.globalefficiencyintel.com/new-blog/2021/3/22/industrial-heating-profile-and-electrification
Industrial Energy Use & Energy-Demanding Sectors - Diversegy, accessed February 2, 2026, https://diversegy.com/industrial-energy-use/
CNNC seeks finance for innovative nuclear project, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/cnnc-seeks-finance-for-innovative-nuclear-project
A Look Back In IPO: Amazon, The Giant In Progress, accessed February 2, 2026, https://news.crunchbase.com/startups/look-back-ipo-amazon-giant-progress/
Why Amazon's History Of IPO-Era Losses Means Little For Today's Unprofitable Unicorns, accessed February 2, 2026, https://news.crunchbase.com/public/why-amazons-history-of-ipo-era-losses-means-little-for-todays-unprofitable-unicorns/
NuScale Power (NYSE: SMR) sets Feb. 26, 2026 business and results call - Stock Titan, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.stocktitan.net/sec-filings/SMR/8-k-nuscale-power-corp-reports-material-event-f7c485591f41.html
31 July 2025 ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC – 2025 Half Year ..., accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.rolls-royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/investors/rr-plc-holdings-2025-half-year-results-press-release.pdf
Quarterly Report - 2025 Q3 | Cameco, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.cameco.com/invest/financial-information/quarterly-reports/2025/q3
Cameco announces third quarter results: financial performance on track for strong finish to the year; nuclear fundamentals strengthened by transformational partnership to deploy Westinghouse reactors in the US; annual dividend declared - Fidelity Investments, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.fidelity.com/news/article/default/202511050645BIZWIRE_USPR_____20251104_BW291675
2026 Crypto Market Outlook - Coinbase Institutional Market Intelligence, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.coinbase.com/institutional/research-insights/research/market-intelligence/2026-crypto-market-outlook
Riot Platforms Reports Third Quarter 2025 Financial Results and ..., accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.riotplatforms.com/riot-platforms-reports-third-quarter-2025-financial-results-and-strategic-highlights/
Riot Platforms, Inc. Releases December 2025 Bitcoin Production and Operations Update, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.quiverquant.com/news/Riot+Platforms%2C+Inc.+Releases+December+2025+Bitcoin+Production+and+Operations+Update
MARA's Vertical Integration Drives Growth, But Bitcoin Risk Remains - January 26, 2026, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/2822806/maras-vertical-integration-drives-growth-but-bitcoin-risk-remains
Top 20 by Trading Value | Amazon surged 10% post-earnings, with AWS achieving its fastest growth in three years; Strategy rose nearly 6% and Coinbase climbed almost 5% amid a sharp increase in net profit for popular crypto-related stocks; Netflix gained n, accessed February 2, 2026, https://news.futunn.com/en/post/64212943/top-20-by-trading-value-amazon-surged-10-post-earnings
Nano Nuclear Energy - Public Comps and Valuation Multiples, accessed February 2, 2026, https://multiples.vc/public-comps/nano-nuclear-energy-valuation-multiples
NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) SEC Filings 2026: Financial Reports and Disclosures, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.insidearbitrage.com/symbol-metrics/SMR/sec
Uranium Energy Corp Files Fiscal 2025 Annual Report - PR Newswire, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/uranium-energy-corp-files-fiscal-2025-annual-report-302565246.html
Denison Reports Financial and Operational Results for Q3 2025, Including First Production from McClean North Uranium Mine - PR Newswire, accessed February 2, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/denison-reports-financial-and-operational-results-for-q3-2025-including-first-production-from-mcclean-north-uranium-mine-302607995.html
Denison Reports Financial and Operational Results for Q3 2025, Including First Production from McClean North Uranium Mine, accessed February 2, 2026, https://denisonmines.com/news/denison-reports-financial-and-operational-results-122835/
Hinkley Point C nuclear power station - Wikipedia, accessed February 2, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinkley_Point_C_nuclear_power_station

Reactor Database Global Dashboard - World Nuclear Association, accessed February 2, 2026, https://world-nuclear.org/nuclear-reactor-database/summary